Rozhodnutí Komise ze dne 30. listopadu 2009, kterým se některé strany osvobozují od rozšíření antidumpingového cla z jízdních kol pocházejících z Čínské lidové republiky uloženého nařízením Rady (EHS) č. 2474/93, naposledy zachovaného a pozměněného nařízením (ES) č. 1095/2005, na některé součásti jízdních kol, a kterým se zrušuje pozastavení platby antidumpingového cla rozšířeného na některé součásti jízdních kol pocházející z Čínské lidové republiky, jež bylo některým stranám přiznáno nařízením Komise (ES) č. 88/97 (oznámeno pod číslem K(2009) 9406) (2009/867/ES)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European CommunityOJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1 . (the basic Regulation),

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 71/97 of 10 January 1997 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EEC) No 2474/93 on bicycles originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of certain bicycle parts from the People’s Republic of China, and levying the extended duty on such imports registered under Regulation (EC) No 703/96OJ L 16, 18.1.1997, p. 55 . (the extending Regulation),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 88/97 of 20 January 1997 on the authorisation of the exemption of imports of certain bicycle parts originating in the People’s Republic of China from the extension by Council Regulation (EC) No 71/97 of the anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2474/93OJ L 17, 21.1.1997, p. 17 . (the exemption Regulation), and in particular Article 7 thereof,

After consulting the Advisory Committee,

The parties listed below in table 1 are hereby exempted from the extension to imports of certain bicycle parts from the People's Republic of China by Regulation (EC) No 71/97 of the definitive anti-dumping duty on bicycles originating in the People's Republic of China imposed by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2474/93OJ L 228, 9.9.1993, p. 1 . , as maintained by Regulation (EC) No 1524/2000OJ L 175, 14.7.2000, p. 39 . and amended by Regulation (EC) No 1095/2005OJ L 183, 14.7.2005, p. 1 . .

The exemption shall take effect in relation to each party as from the relevant date shown in the column headed Date of effect. Table 1 List of parties to be exempted NameAddressCountryExemption pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 88/97Date of effectTARIC additional codeMADIROM PROD SRLBucuresti, Sector 6, Splaiul Independentei no. 319, OB. 152RomaniaArticle 711.8.2008 A896Rose Versand GmbHSchersweide 4, 46395 BocholtGermanyArticle 716.9.2008 A897Winora Staiger GmbHMax-Planck-Strasse 6, 97526 SennfeldGermanyArticle 727.11.2008 A894

OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1 .

⟪TABLE:tbl_001⟫

(1) After the entry into force of the exemption Regulation, a number of bicycle assemblers submitted requests pursuant to Article 3 of that Regulation for exemption from the anti-dumping duty as extended to imports of certain bicycle parts from the People’s Republic of China by Regulation (EC) No 71/97 (the extended anti-dumping duty). The Commission has published in the Official Journal successive lists of bicycle assemblersOJ C 45, 13.2.1997, p. 3 , OJ C 112, 10.4.1997, p. 9 , OJ C 220, 19.7.1997, p. 6 , OJ C 378, 13.12.1997, p. 2 , OJ C 217, 11.7.1998, p. 9 , OJ C 37, 11.2.1999, p. 3 , OJ C 186, 2.7.1999, p. 6 , OJ C 216, 28.7.2000, p. 8 , OJ C 170, 14.6.2001, p. 5 , OJ C 103, 30.4.2002, p. 2 , OJ C 35, 14.2.2003, p. 3 , OJ C 43, 22.2.2003, p. 5 , OJ C 54, 2.3.2004, p. 2 , OJ C 299, 4.12.2004, p. 4 , OJ L 17, 21.1.2006, p. 16 and OJ L 313, 14.11.2006, p. 5 ., OJ L 81, 20.3.2008, p. 73 ., OJ C 310, 5.12.2008, p. 19 ., OJ L 19, 23.1.2009, p. 62 . for which the payment of the extended anti-dumping duty in respect of their imports of essential bicycle parts declared for free circulation was suspended pursuant to Article 5(1) of the exemption Regulation.

(2) Following the last publication of the list of parties under examinationOJ L 19, 23.1.2009, p. 62 . , a period of examination has been selected. This period was defined as from 1 January 2007 to 31 May 2009 . A questionnaire was sent to all parties under examination, requesting information on the assembly operations conducted during the relevant period of examination.

(3) The Commission received from the parties listed in table 1 below all the information required for the determination of the admissibility of their requests. These parties had already received their suspension with effect from the day of arrival of a first complete application dossier at the Commission premises. The newly requested and provided information was examined and verified, where necessary, at the premises of the parties concerned. Based on this information, the Commission found that the requests submitted by the parties listed in table 1 below are admissible pursuant to Article 4(1) of the exemption Regulation.

(4) The facts as finally ascertained by the Commission show that for all of these applicants' bicycle assembly operations, the value of the parts originating in the People's Republic of China which were used in their assembly operations was lower than 60 % of the total value of the parts used in these assembly operations, and they, therefore, fall outside the scope of Article 13(2) of the basic Regulation.

(5) For this reason, and in accordance with Article 7(1) of the exemption Regulation, the parties listed in the above table should be exempted from the extended anti-dumping duty.

(6) In accordance with Article 7(2) of the exemption Regulation, the exemption of the parties listed in table 1 from the extended anti-dumping duty should take effect as from the date of receipt of their requests. In addition, their customs debt in respect of the extended anti-dumping duty is to be considered void as from the date of receipt of their requests for exemption.

(7) The party listed in table 2 below also submitted a request for exemption from the extended anti-dumping duty.

(8) This party did not submit a questionnaire reply.

(9) Since the party listed in table 2 failed to meet the criteria for exemption set by Article 6(2) of the exemption Regulation, the Commission has to reject its request for exemption, in accordance with Article 7(3) of the Regulation. In the light of this, the suspension of the payment of the extended anti-dumping duty referred to in Article 5 of the exemption Regulation must be lifted and the extended anti-dumping duty must be collected as from the date of receipt of the request submitted by this party.

(10) Interested parties are hereby informed of the receipt of further requests for exemption, pursuant to Article 3 of the exemption Regulation, from parties listed in table 3. The suspension from the extended duty, following these requests, should take effect as shown in the column headed Date of effect:

The request for exemption from the extended anti-dumping duty submitted pursuant to Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 88/97 by the party listed below in table 2 is hereby rejected.

The suspension of payment of the extended anti-dumping duty pursuant to Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 88/97 is hereby lifted for the party concerned as from the relevant date shown in the column headed Date of effect. Table 2 List of parties for which the suspension is to be lifted NameAddressCountrySuspension pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 88/97Date of effectTARIC additional codeCITIC – MARMES BICYCLE CZ, s.r.o.Žichlínské Předměstí, Albrechtická 391, 56301 LanškrounCzech RepublicArticle 523.5.2008 A891

OJ L 16, 18.1.1997, p. 55 .

⟪TABLE:tbl_002⟫

Article 1 Article 1

Article 2 Article 2

Article 3 Article 3

Article 4 Article 4

The parties listed in table 3 below constitute the updated list of parties under examination pursuant to Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 88/97. The suspension from the extended duty, following these requests, took effect from the relevant date in the column headed Date of effect in Table 3. Table 3 List of parties under examination NameAddressCountrySuspension pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 88/97Date of effectTARIC additional codeEddy Merckx Cycles N.V.Birrebeekstraat 1, 1860 MeiseBelgiumArticle 530.4.2009 A954Sektor SRLVia Don Peruzzi 27/B, 36027 Rosa (VI)ItalyArticle 527.5.2009 A956

OJ L 17, 21.1.1997, p. 17 .

⟪TABLE:tbl_003⟫

This Decision is addressed to the Member States and to the parties listed in Article 1, 2 and 3.

OJ C 45, 13.2.1997, p. 3 , OJ C 112, 10.4.1997, p. 9 , OJ C 220, 19.7.1997, p. 6 , OJ C 378, 13.12.1997, p. 2 , OJ C 217, 11.7.1998, p. 9 , OJ C 37, 11.2.1999, p. 3 , OJ C 186, 2.7.1999, p. 6 , OJ C 216, 28.7.2000, p. 8 , OJ C 170, 14.6.2001, p. 5 , OJ C 103, 30.4.2002, p. 2 , OJ C 35, 14.2.2003, p. 3 , OJ C 43, 22.2.2003, p. 5 , OJ C 54, 2.3.2004, p. 2 , OJ C 299, 4.12.2004, p. 4 , OJ L 17, 21.1.2006, p. 16 and OJ L 313, 14.11.2006, p. 5 ., OJ L 81, 20.3.2008, p. 73 ., OJ C 310, 5.12.2008, p. 19 ., OJ L 19, 23.1.2009, p. 62 .

⟪TABLE:tbl_004⟫

OJ L 19, 23.1.2009, p. 62 .

⟪TABLE:tbl_005⟫

OJ L 228, 9.9.1993, p. 1 .

⟪TABLE:tbl_006⟫

OJ L 175, 14.7.2000, p. 39 .

OJ L 183, 14.7.2005, p. 1 .

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: