Rozhodnutí Komise ze dne 19. prosince 2011, kterým se některé strany osvobozují od rozšíření antidumpingového cla z jízdních kol pocházejících z Čínské lidové republiky uloženého nařízením Rady (EHS) č. 2474/93, na některé součásti jízdních kol a kterým se zrušují pozastavení a osvobození od platby antidumpingového cla rozšířeného na některé součásti jízdních kol pocházející z Čínské lidové republiky, jež bylo některým stranám přiznáno nařízením Komise (ES) č. 88/97 (oznámeno pod číslem K(2011) 9473) (2011/876/EU)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European CommunityOJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51 . (the basic Regulation),

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 71/97OJ L 16, 18.1.1997, p. 55 . (the extending Regulation), extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2474/93OJ L 228, 9.9.1993, p. 1 . Regulation as maintained by Regulation (EC) No 1524/2000 (OJ L 175, 14.7.2000, p. 39 ) and amended by Regulation (EC) No 1095/2005 (OJ L 183, 14.7.2005, p. 1 ). on bicycles originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of certain bicycle parts from the People’s Republic of China, and levying the extended duty on such imports registered under Commission Regulation (EC) No 703/96OJ L 98, 19.4.1996, p. 3 . ,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 88/97OJ L 17, 21.1.1997, p. 17 . (the exemption Regulation) on the authorisation of the exemption of imports of certain bicycle parts originating in the People’s Republic of China from the extension by Regulation (EC) No 71/97 of the anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EEC) No 2474/93, and in particular Article 7 thereof,

After consulting the Advisory Committee,

The parties listed below in table 1 are hereby exempt from the extension to imports of certain bicycle parts from the People’s Republic of China by Regulation (EC) No 71/97 of the definitive anti-dumping duty on bicycles originating in the People’s Republic of China imposed by Regulation (EEC) No 2474/93, last amended and maintained by Regulation (EC) No 1095/2005.

The exemption shall take effect in relation to each party as from the relevant date shown in the column headed Date of effect. Table 1 List of parties to be exempt NameAddressCountryExemption pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 88/97Date of effectTARIC additional codeBlue Factory Team S.L.CL Torres y Villaroel 6, Elche Parque Industrial, 03320 AlicanteSpainArticle 716.7.2010 A984CODE X Sp. z o.o.Olszanka 109, 33-386 Podegrodzie (initially ul. Krolewska 16, 00-103 Warszawa)PolandArticle 722.1.2010 A966JETLANE SAS (initially JET’LEAN SAS)4, boulevard de Mons, 59650 Villeneuve-d’AscqFranceArticle 718.2.2010 A968Kwasny & Diekhöner GmbHHerforder Strasse 331, 33609 BielefeldGermanyArticle 75.7.2011 A993Maxtec Ltd1 Golyamokonarsko shose Str., 4204 Tsaratsovo, PlovdivBulgariaArticle 715.10.2010 A991Metelli di Staffoni Mario & C.S.A.S.Via Trento 68, 25030 Trenzano (BS)ItalyArticle 713.4.2010 A979Müller GmbHRiedlerweg 7, 8054 GrazAustriaArticle 730.3.2010 A978 (initially A977)Unicykel ABAröds Industrieväg 14, 422 43 Hisings BackaSwedenArticle 711.1.2010 A967

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51 .

⟪TABLE:tbl_001⟫

(1) After the entry into force of the exemption Regulation, a number of bicycle assemblers submitted requests pursuant to Article 3 of the exemption Regulation for exemption from the anti-dumping duty as extended to imports of certain bicycle parts from the People’s Republic of China by Regulation (EC) No 71/97 (the extended anti-dumping duty). The Commission has published in the Official Journal of the European Union successive lists of bicycle assemblersOJ C 45, 13.2.1997, p. 3 , OJ C 112, 10.4.1997, p. 9 , OJ C 220, 19.7.1997, p. 6 , OJ C 378, 13.12.1997, p. 2 , OJ C 217, 11.7.1998, p. 9 , OJ C 37, 11.2.1999, p. 3 , OJ C 186, 2.7.1999, p. 6 , OJ C 216, 28.7.2000, p. 8 , OJ C 170, 14.6.2001, p. 5 , OJ C 103, 30.4.2002, p. 2 , OJ C 35, 14.2.2003, p. 3 , OJ C 43, 22.2.2003, p. 5 , OJ C 54, 2.3.2004, p. 2 , OJ C 299, 4.12.2004, p. 4 , OJ L 17, 21.1.2006, p. 16 and OJ L 313, 14.11.2006, p. 5 , OJ L 81, 20.3.2008, p. 73 , OJ C 310, 5.12.2008, p. 19 , OJ L 19, 23.1.2009, p. 62 , OJ L 314, 1.12.2009, p. 106 , OJ L 136, 24.5.2011, p. 99 . for which the payment of the extended anti-dumping duty in respect of their imports of essential bicycle parts declared for free circulation was suspended pursuant to Article 5(1) of the exemption Regulation.

(2) Following the last publication of the list of parties under examinationOJ L 136, 24.5.2011, p. 99 . , a main period of examination has been selected. This period runs from 1 January 2011 to 31 July 2011 . Additional information from the years 2009 and 2010 was also requested. A questionnaire requesting information on the assembly operations conducted during the relevant period was sent to all parties under examination.

(3) The Commission was also informed of the liquidation of one company which was exempted from the extended anti-dumping duty on bicycle parts. Furthermore, one company informed the Commission that it had stopped its assembly operations.

(4) The Commission received from the parties listed in table 1 below all the information required for the determination of the admissibility of their requests. These parties had already received their suspension with effect from the day of receipt by the Commission of a first complete request. Based on this information, the Commission found that the requests submitted by the parties listed in table 1 below are admissible pursuant to Article 4(1) of the exemption Regulation.

(5) It was established during the examination that for all of the applicants the value of the parts originating in the PRC used in their assembly operations was lower than 60 % of the total value of the parts used in those operations. Consequently, they fall outside the scope of Article 13(2) of the basic Regulation.

(6) For this reason, and in accordance with Article 7(1) of the exemption Regulation, the parties listed in table 1 above should be exempted from the extended anti-dumping duty.

(7) In accordance with Article 7(2) of the exemption Regulation, the exemption of the parties listed in table 1 above from the extended anti-dumping duty should take effect as from the date of receipt of their requests. In addition, their customs debt in respect of the extended anti-dumping duty is to be considered void as from the date of receipt of their requests for exemption.

(8) The company CODE X Sp. z o.o. changed its address during the examination procedure. The company received its suspension under the address ul. Krolewska 16, 00-103 Warszawa, Poland. During the suspension period the address changed to Olszanka 109, 33-386 Podegrodzie, Poland. This change of address does not affect the initial request for suspension or the decision on the exemption.

(9) The company JETLANE SAS changed its name during the examination procedure. The company was initially suspended under its name JET’LEAN SAS. During the suspension period the company changed its name to JETLANE SAS. This change of name does not affect the initial request for suspension or the decision on the exemption.

(10) TARIC additional code A977 initially given to the company Müller GmbH was erroneously attributed twice and had to be withdrawn. On 3 June 2010 the company received TARIC additional code A978. This change of code does not affect the initial request for suspension or the decision on the exemption.

(11) The party listed in table 2 below also submitted a request for exemption from the extended anti-dumping duty.

(12) The party in question assembled bicycles as subcontractor and not in its own name. The company had no purchases of parts and it could not be evaluated if the assembly operations complied with the conditions set out in Article 7(1) of the exemption Regulation.

(13) On these grounds the Commission has to reject its request, in accordance with Article 7(3) of the exemption Regulation. Consequently, the suspension of the payment of the extended anti-dumping duty referred to in Article 5 of the exemption Regulation must be lifted and the extended anti-dumping duty collected as from the date of receipt of the request for exemption submitted by this party, i.e. the date as of which the suspension took effect.

(14) For the parties listed in table 3 below the exemption is to be revoked.

(15) These parties were exempted from the extended anti-dumping duty on bicycle parts. One party now informed the Commission services that it had stopped its assembly operations. Following an enquiry, the Commission services were informed by a Court in Portugal that the other party had been liquidated. For both parties exemption should be revoked.

(16) The parties listed in table 4 also submitted requests for exemption from the payment of the extended anti-dumping duty:

(17) One of these parties is an assembler of electrical bicycles whose imports are not subject to anti-dumping duty on bicycle parts according to Regulation (EC) No 71/97. This party is not eligible for an exemption. For some parties the supply of parts for the production of bicycles covered by the measures according to Regulation (EC) No 71/97 falls within the de minimis threshold of less than 300 units on a monthly basis as specified in Article 14(c) of the exemption Regulation. Consequently, those parties did not meet the conditions of Article 4.1(a) of the exemption Regulation and an exemption could not be granted. Some other parties had not started the production of bicycles yet and hence no suspension could be granted to them.

(18) All companies listed in tables 1-4 above were informed and given the opportunity to comment. None of the comments received were such as to alter the conclusions set out in this Decision,

The request for exemption from the extended anti-dumping duty submitted pursuant to Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 88/97 by the party listed below in table 2 is hereby rejected.

The suspension of payment of the extended anti-dumping duty pursuant to Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 88/97 is hereby lifted for the party concerned as from the relevant date shown in the column headed Date of effect. Table 2 List of parties for which the suspension is to be lifted NameAddressCountrySuspension pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 88/97Date of effectTARIC additional codeBikeworks AC GmbHErnst-Abbe-Strasse 28, 52249 EschweilerGermanyArticle 511.6.2010 A980

OJ L 16, 18.1.1997, p. 55 .

⟪TABLE:tbl_002⟫

Article 1 Article 1

Article 2 Article 2

Article 3 Article 3

Article 4 Article 4

Article 5 Article 5

The exemptions from the payment of the extended anti-dumping duty pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 88/97 for the parties listed below in table 3 are to be revoked pursuant to Article 10 of the exemption Regulation.

The exemption from the payment of the extended anti-dumping duty is hereby lifted for the parties concerned as from the relevant date shown in the column headed Date of effect. Table 3 List of parties for which the exemption is to be lifted NameAddressCountryExemption pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 88/97Date of effectTARIC additional codeBicicletas de Alava SLC/Arcacha 1, 01006 VitoriaSpainArticle 71 day after publication of the present Decision8963Fundador-Sociedade Importadora de Sangalhos, Lda.Apartado, 26, P-3781-908 SangalhosPortugalArticle 71 day after publication of the present Decision8244

OJ L 228, 9.9.1993, p. 1 . Regulation as maintained by Regulation (EC) No 1524/2000 (OJ L 175, 14.7.2000, p. 39 ) and amended by Regulation (EC) No 1095/2005 (OJ L 183, 14.7.2005, p. 1 ).

⟪TABLE:tbl_003⟫

The requests for exemption from the extended anti-dumping duty made by the parties listed below in table 4 are hereby rejected. Table 4 List of parties for which the request for exemption is rejected NameAddressCountryApollo Electric Bikes B.V.Leemstraat 6, 4705 RH RoosendaalThe NetherlandsIN CYCLES, Montagem e Comércio de Bicicletas Lda.Zona Industrial de Oiă, Lote A e B, Apartado 175, 3770-059 OiăPortugalKleinebenne GmbHHansastrasse 22, 33818 LeopoldshöheGermanyMOBIKY-TECH675, Promenade des Ports, 50000 Saint-LôFranceMOVITEC SRLJud. Brasov, Aeroportului Street 2, 507075 GhimbavRomaniaSun Baby Jacek GabrusUl. Jana Styki 12, 64-920 PilaPolandTORPADO S.R.L.Viale Enzo Ferrari 11, 30014 Cavarzere (VE)Italy

OJ L 98, 19.4.1996, p. 3 .

⟪TABLE:tbl_004⟫

This Decision is addressed to the Member States and to the parties listed in Articles 1, 2, 3 and 4. It is also published in the Official Journal of the European Union .

OJ L 17, 21.1.1997, p. 17 .

⟪TABLE:tbl_005⟫

OJ C 45, 13.2.1997, p. 3 , OJ C 112, 10.4.1997, p. 9 , OJ C 220, 19.7.1997, p. 6 , OJ C 378, 13.12.1997, p. 2 , OJ C 217, 11.7.1998, p. 9 , OJ C 37, 11.2.1999, p. 3 , OJ C 186, 2.7.1999, p. 6 , OJ C 216, 28.7.2000, p. 8 , OJ C 170, 14.6.2001, p. 5 , OJ C 103, 30.4.2002, p. 2 , OJ C 35, 14.2.2003, p. 3 , OJ C 43, 22.2.2003, p. 5 , OJ C 54, 2.3.2004, p. 2 , OJ C 299, 4.12.2004, p. 4 , OJ L 17, 21.1.2006, p. 16 and OJ L 313, 14.11.2006, p. 5 , OJ L 81, 20.3.2008, p. 73 , OJ C 310, 5.12.2008, p. 19 , OJ L 19, 23.1.2009, p. 62 , OJ L 314, 1.12.2009, p. 106 , OJ L 136, 24.5.2011, p. 99 .

⟪TABLE:tbl_006⟫

OJ L 136, 24.5.2011, p. 99 .

⟪TABLE:tbl_007⟫

⟪TABLE:tbl_008⟫

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: